ISSUES ABOUT THE NOYNOY AQUINO ADMINISTRATION
There are a lot of issues experienced by our dear Director Benigno Aquino III or just known as PNoy.
1 . Qualification on the Position
1st, let's declare the fact that he wasn't voted in to office as a result of actual skills. He was a lackluster councilpersoncouncilwoman in our elected representatives and didn't exactly produce impressions with regards to his profession. He coasted along right up until his mother died. All of a sudden everybody believed it would be a smart idea to vote him into workplace as chief executive. It was precisely what is expected with the son in the late Suave and Cory Aquino, equally great previous presidents with the Philippines. He lacks charisma or even fundamental public speaking capabilities. The media has a lot of bad comments especially when he speaks while using press. This individual commits a whole lot of ridiculous pronouncements and frequently what he says is beyond comprehension. He should get himself a mass media coach to train him in handling him self around the press and the entire country.
installment payments on your Hacienda Luisita
With the ascent of Chief executive Benigno Aquino III for the presidency, the continuing future of Hacienda Luisita has become a focus of attention. This matter was said to be settled years ago. However the Hacienda Luisita management did not do all their part for the agreement. Although the agreement to stay the decades-old clash is roofed on the Complete Agrarian Change Program (CARP), the present machinations of the administration is seen as deceitful as they just opt to give more than you, 000 hectares of property plus funds instead of releasing to maqui berry farmers the more than 4, 500 hectares already designated by Department of Agrarian Change for circulation to farmer-beneficiaries.
You will find a report upon Noynoy Aquino saying your dog is got lower than one percent share from the hacienda. After that, in another tale, he was cited as stating they would have gotten for least P3 billion in case the 4, 500-hectare land had been sold at P4. 5 billion dollars. In one tale, Noynoy was quoted as saying that they might give up the land; having been backed by three of his sisters whom said precisely the same. And then, there is certainly Noynoy's reaction to a New York Times history telling all of us that his cousin, Fernando Cojuangco, chief operating official of the possessing company for the patrimonio, was misquoted when he stated that " the extended Cojuangco family, owners of the plantation since 1958, had no intention of giving up the land or the sugar organization. вЂќ So what's the true score?
There are half-truths and half-lies. The reality are: the acquisition of Patrimonio Luisita that kicks off in august 1957 was through a P5. 9-million loan from the Authorities Service Insurance System, along with a loan of $2. 1 million via Manufacturer's Trust Company of recent York and Chase New york Bank in america. The GSIS loan was explicitly linked with the condition and a clear enquete that the gets be allocated to the gardening workers.
several. Executive Buy 1, The reality Commission
Director Benigno " Noynoy" Aquino III signed Executive Buy 1, resulting in the Truth Commission rate tasked to look into graft and corruption allegations that hounded the past administration. Aquino said the executive purchase was in line with his assurance to form the Truth Commission inside the first 75 days of his administration. This individual said that past Supreme Court docket Chief Justice Hilario Davide Jr. will head the commission that has been tasked to investigate and seek out the truth about file corruption error allegations that have been committed over the last nine years by govt officials and their accomplices inside the private sector. A week following, the Best Court reported unconstitutional Director Noynoy Aquino's Executive Order No . one particular, which creates the Truth Commission rate to take a look at corruption accusations against the earlier administration, such as NBN handle ZTE, the 2004 poll fraud, and the fertilizer fund scam. The Court minted down EO 1 stating the order violated the equal safeguard clause by singling out the administration of former director Gloria Regato. Many had been shocked,...